Friday, November 9, 2007

PG

So runner Dave and Leanne will be arriving within the next couple of hours, so the children are helping to ensure that the house is as messy as possible for their arrival. Paul will be getting home from work around the same time they arrive. And I convinced him to bring some Arby's home for dinner. I love my husband!!!!!!!!

So as well as finding that I am writing a blog for the scholarly, I also checked up on my blog's rating. Keeper of the Cheerios is now PG instead of G. The reason given was three instances of the word breast and one of the word sex. I will grant that the post in which these words were used is somewhat illicit and not appropriate for very small children. However, I really do not believe that sex or breast are bad words.

I could have been writing an article about how the doctor had easily determined the sex of our baby by doing so many ultrasounds. Or I could have been discussing sex as the Latin number six and the root of the word sextuplet. Speaking of sex, is that also the root of sexton?

Then again I could have been writing a recipe which called for breast of chicken or breast of turkey. Or I could have been discussing how I plan to breast feed the baby because breast milk is the absolute best nutrition for baby. Breast is not a dirty word! I wish our culture was more understanding of the fact that God designed breasts for the purpose of feeding babies (and perhaps with other mating purposes in mind).

7 comments:

Shae said...

Hehe! I just made my blog R rated... I had to check. I also used the word dead once, which counts against me too.

Kathy said...

*laughs* I have to laugh. Just imagine what would happen if you were to post that email about the city trying to fine the beavers for not obtaining a permit that you showed me when I was visiting.

Anonymous said...

I am tempted to post that letter for entertainment value. However, because dam is spelled differently than the swear word, I don't imagine it will affect the rating,

Anonymous said...

I thought this post would boost your rating.

The Long Walk blog has tended to have a high rating due to frequent occurences of words like "death" and "torture".

Fortunately, the real MPAA rating system is not quite as arbitrary, though the raters' judgments are often bizarre. Two or three use of the word "f---" is destined to earn a movie an R rating, while rather extreme violence can be found even in PG movies. The criteria remain mysterious as far as I can tell.

Anonymous said...

I thought this post would boost your rating.

The Long Walk blog has tended to have a high rating due to frequent occurences of words like "death" and "torture".

Fortunately, the real MPAA rating system is not quite as arbitrary, though the raters' judgments are often bizarre. Two or three use of the word "f---" is destined to earn a movie an R rating, while rather extreme violence can be found even in PG movies. The criteria remain mysterious as far as I can tell.

Unknown said...

The scary part - this is how web-filtering software works. Our legislators force such garbage into our libraries and classrooms because Johnny and Sally might look at porn... at school! (::horrified gasp::)

Good parents, like you guys, instill values and expectations into your kids' lives. They won't need a robotic nanny filtering their pages, and such contrivances will only hinder their learning.

Sorry. I just had to get political.

Anonymous said...

Doug,

I totally agree about the filters. It turns out that a lot of them block out sites about breast cancer, but fail to block out true porn.

It really bugs me how more and more parents are expecting everyone else to be responsible for their children.